" /> Moot Thoughts & Musings: November 2003 Archives

« October 2003 | Main | December 2003 »

November 24, 2003

popping in

the ravioli di zucca is divine. But I invited a bunch more people over yesterday, so now I have to make more. I'll post the recipe later. Just imagine pumpkin being cooked down in heavy cream, sage, and thyme. How's that to keep you hanging on my every word!? Hahahahaa!!!

I'm really in a flurry. Trying to balance life and Thanksgiving is quite a lot. And my computer is STILL dead, so that means I'm in the library computer lab. (HORRORS!) AND I thought I would add a little extra excitement into my life (as if I needed anymore) by starting up the Collegium here once again. So I'm trying to organize that to start next semester.

All I can think about is cooking. In my other life I would be chef. Yesterday I made a fabuluous cream of carrot/pear/apple soup. Mmmm. SO GOOD!!!!

I've got to leave before I start drooling on the keyboard, which would be bad in a public computer lab. I might give someone latent meningitis or something.

November 22, 2003

on cuisine!

Thanksgiving looms. I'm getting really excited. My project for today is making a huge batch of pumpkin ravioli...ravioli di zucca! I've sorted through a bazillion recipes on the internet. I'll let you know how it turns out. I also found a lovely fruit soup that I think I'll start the dinner with! mmmm

It's the chef's holiday!

November 20, 2003

woe is me!!

MY COMPUTER IS DEAD!!!!!!!!

I don't know what happened. It has just decided not to start anymore. Chris put his ear to it and said, it sounds like the hard drive.

I'm ruined!!!!!!!!!!! My computer is more important than my car!!!! (you at least can walk if your car dies.) THe thought of hte possibility of never being able to retrieve the information (saved nowhere else, due to the fact that I never got around to buying a zip drive) is horrible, horrible, horrible.

Macs don't do this to you!!!! I feel betrayed!!!!! At least it went quickly. Maybe all hope is not lost. I haven't had it for a year yet, I'm really hoping it's still under warranty.

At any rate, terrible things have befallen me!!!!

November 18, 2003

i'm in love

with Monteverdi's Vespers!!!

The cd I have (picture right) is one that I listen to regularly, and goign to hear it the other night just enhanced my appreciation for this fabulous piece of music. I do not recommend the Boston Baroque recording (the one I have), the vibrato, I think is a bit to wobbly for early Baroque, and the vocal embellishments aren't as precise as they should be. I would recommend a Harmonia mundi recording, or perhaps the Gabrieli consort. They did a great period rendition of Messiah that I totally love!

the beginning of the end

On top of an exhilirating weekend, I finally turned in my term paper Monday morning. (In the end it clocked in around 17 pages. Immense relief finding out that the prof didn't mind if we went over 10.) I was thinking about writing papers and how much I've grown since undergrad days. How I have something to say now, or at least more so than then. Knowing how to research, construct an argument, support a thesis. I love writing papers!!!! (When they're done, of course)

Now I'm so tired. I don't have any huge projects to turn in. Back to normal life. I'm faced with the work for my other classes, wh. I've let slack, and a huge pile of grading I've been putting off, but I'm too tired to think about it. The end of the semester looms. I wish I could take just seminars. These stupid lecture classes take up so much time..... Tests are so stupid! Hello!!? Isn't that what generals are for???

i am a rock

Chris and i are really happy here in NOLA. We love our church. We love our jobs. But we're so dang busy. We're usually just happy to be together, thus don't really notice the lack of good friends. Sure, we're friends with the people in our church. But neither of us feel like we really click with anyone, though we're probably closest with our pastor's family. This weekend I made some new friends. Last night Chris went to a movie with some guys from Desire. We were thinknig a little how we miss the interaction, the companionship. He doesn't click at all with the folks at the school/ministry. (There's not much personality to click with anyway.) I'm not really complaining. We don't really have time to go out and make friends. There's not really a context to do that anyway. I guess I'm just kind of observing. Sometimes if I feel like chatting with a friend, and it's not a good time to call anyone, that is when I sometimes write in my blog. Since there really isn't anyone else to talk to. Well, better go to the library....

November 17, 2003

AMS report

Well, AMS turned out to be a really great time despite the noticeable absence of my old prof and my friend Joanna. (I was a little worried that I would be able to have a good time for a while.) Matt Kickasola showed up, and he seemed to be doing really well. We had a lot of fun hanging out.

I rode over Thursday morning with a professor and two students (another musicology student and a theory student) from my department. It was an easy 4 hr ride from Baton Rouge to Houston. Thankfully, LSU paid for the hotel and food for us, wh. was a huge unexpected blessing (it's always nice to have a winning football team...it makes everyone happier). I worked again as a student volunteer, serving my time at the registration desk. I'm beginning to wonder if I'll do it again. The past couple of years it was great, because it was a ready context to meet people and to place faces with names, but now I feel like I don't want my time to hear papers and hang out with people cut into by hours at the registration desk. I'll have to think about that for next year.

This year I came to buy books. I haven't for the past couple of years, but this year I had a pretty specific idea about what I wanted to get on the conference discount, and that was the Josquin Companion, wh. I got for $40 cheaper. I also finally picked up _Tonal Structures in Early Music_ and Cristle's book on reading Ren music theory, wh. I'm really excited about, especially in the context of stuff I've been working through in my editing Ren mss class.

This semester I feel like I've arrived at a level knowledge that allows me to be functional at papers. In other words, they're not so completely over my head that I can actually follow them and engage with them in my head. Highlights included a L'homme arme paper, offering a fresh context for examining the phenomenon, looking at church militant symbols in the ritualistic aspects (like priestly vestments, etc.). Also an interesting paper in nice Meg Bent style examining the translation from mensural notation to tabulature as basically the same kind of translation process that goes on from mens notation to our modern notation. Some interesting critical thoughts about the whole editing process. There was also a cool paper about a manuscript given by a Flemish merchant family of Italian origin to the Henry VIII Tudor family (Royal XI E 11). My favorite part about those kinds of papers is the iconographical discussions. Apparently the gift of this ms collides with a reunion of the Henry and his two sisters after many years. Flowers representing them, as well other Tudor symbols were all over. In the discussion following, Mary Lewis pointed out that she actually possessed in her garden an antique rose, supposedly from the 15th c., that really bloomed with red and white petals. I think my favorite paper, though, was by Honey Meconi. She talked about this made-up vocabulary, vaguely reminiscent of Greek in alphabet, in some chants by Hildegard von Bingen. At one point, Honey stopped and sang the chant. It was beautiful, and then Honey started crying! And trying to collect herself said "I sing this all the time! It's so beautiful!" and laughingly said "I've never cried at AMS before!" Her enthusiasm for the topic, ease in presentation, and good scholarship have made her a new favorite scholar on my list of favorite scholars. I'm going to have to read more by her.

On Thursday evening we went to a fabulous performance of Monteverdi's Vespers. A Baroque orchestra complete with two massive chitarrone accompanied an amazingly precise choir. The soloists were really good, too, some with excellent early Baroque vocal embellishments...the first time I've ever heard gorgia live! I'm all inspired now to really get going on this resurrecting Collegium thing. And I got a lot of helpful advice concerning that over the weekend. Early Music America had an informative question/answer period for directors of early music ensembles. I beginning to get some ideas. Now if I could just get some money from the dean.... :-)

The highlight of the weekend for me, though, was getting to know the other FMCS students. Emily and I have emailed a couple of times both expressing our desire to get to know each other better. We connected at the beginning of the weekend and hit it off right away. Few people I meet can I say right away that they are a kindred spirit. Laughing and talking throughout the weeknd. It was exciting to have that time of connection and bonding with her and a couple of others. It was startling, too, that once I started hanging out with them how starved I felt for Christian company. It's like I was just used to not having Christian fellowship at school, so when I was around it again, I didn't realize how much I missed it. I cornered another FMCS person and chewed his ear off for a while, too. He made some interesting points that I'm eager to pursue. For instance, I panic when I think about connecting the musical score to the larger "world". He made a point, though, that reading hte theorists often make the connection. To which I thought, "OF course! Why didn't I think of that!? after all, that's what I'm doing all the time in Ren stuff!" I'm excited to back and revisit some thoughts in light of this. Anyway...I really enjoyed getting to know FMCS people that weren't Cov people. I can't wait for March, and if at all possible, I'm goign to try to hop over to Princeton when we're up there over the holidays to visit my new friends (if they're there and not on their Christmas break). I can't wait to see them again!

well, anyway, this is my AMS report. Houston isn't much to speak of. It's the deadest city I have ever been to! I hope I never have to go back there. Looking forward to next year and Seatlle.

November 12, 2003

turn on the air!

i just want to say that it is 2.30 in the afternoon on November 12 and the heat index is 87 degrees F.

November 11, 2003

what's going on

paper, test, packing, road trip, AMS=camp for scholars.

November 10, 2003

How to Write an Argument

How to Write an Argument

WHAT STUDENTS AND TEACHERS REALLY NEED TO KNOW

1. Enter a conversation just as you do in real life. Begin your text by directly identifying the prior conversation or debate that you are entering. What you have to say won't make sense unless your readers know the conversation in which you are saying it.

2. Make a claim, the sooner the better, preferably flagged for the reader by a phrase like "My claim here is that ... You don't actually have to use this exact phrase, but if you couldn't do so you're in trouble.

3. Remind readers of your claim periodically, especially the more you complicate it. If you're writing about a disputed topic — and if you aren't, why write? — you'll also have to stop and tell the reader what you are not saying, what you don't want readers to take you as saying. Some of them will take you to be saying it anyway, but you don't have to make it easy for them.

4. Summarize the objections that you anticipate will be made (or that have in fact been made) against your claim. This is done by using such formulas as "Here you will probably object that. . . ," "To put the point another way...," or "But why, you may ask, am I so emphatic on this point?" Remember that your critics, even when they get mean and nasty, are your friends: you need them to help you to clarify your claim and to indicate why what you're saying is of interest to others besides yourself. Remember, too, that if naysayers didn't exist, you'd have no excuse for saying what you are saying.

5. Say explicitly why you think what you're saying is important and what difference it would make to the world if you are right or wrong. Imagine a reader over your shoulder who asks, "So what?" Or "Who cares about any of this?" Again, you don't actually have to write such questions in, but if you were to do so and couldn't answer them you're in trouble.

6. Write a meta-text into your essay that stands apart from your main text and puts it in perspective. An effective argumentative essay really consists of two texts, one in which you make your argument and a second one in which you tell readers how and how not to read it. This second text is usually signaled by reflexive phrases like "Of course I don't mean to suggest that. ..,""What I've been trying to say here, then, is that. . . ," etc. When student writing is unclear or lame, the reason often has less to do with jargon, verbal obscurity, or bad grammar than with the absence of this layer of meta-commentary, which explains why the writer thought it was necessary to write the essay in the first place.

7. Remember that readers can process only one claim at a time, so resist the temptation to try to squeeze in secondary claims that are better left for another essay or paragraph, or for another section of your essay that's clearly marked off from your main claim. If you're a professional academic, you are probably so anxious to prove that you've left no thought unconsidered that you find it hard to resist the temptation to try to say everything all at once. Remember that giving in to this temptation to say it all at once will result in saying nothing that will be understood while producing horribly overloaded paragraphs and sentences like this one, monster-sized discursive footnotes, and readers who fling your text down and reach for the TV Guide.

8. Be bilingual. It is not necessary to avoid Academicspeak — you sometimes need the stuff to say what you want to say. But whenever you do have to say something in Academicspeak, try also to say it in conversational English as well. You'll be surprised to discover that when you restate an academic point in your nonacademic voice, the point will either sound fresher or you'll see how shallow it is and remove it.

9. Don't kid yourself. If you couldn't explain it to your parents the chances are you don't understand it yourself.

From Graff, Gerald. Clueless in Academe: How Schooling Obscures the Life of the Mind. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003, pp 275-277.

did it again

I planted my fall potted garden on Saturday. It took me all day. I had to reorganize the porch after repairs had been made, etc. It is now a lovely haven. But my week is set back again. I'm going insane!

November 7, 2003

internet sources

As a rule, I don't use the internet for research. I just don't. And I think the reasons are obvious. However, given the sheer impossibility of part of my task for this paper I'm working, I was driven to the internet as a last resort. And I was rewarded with some valuable information. I assessed the quality of the source and ascertained that the information was valid, and I left feeling happily in touch with the new world order.

Now I have to cite the information. Kate, unfortunately, is a little vauge on this matter. But I've come up with a good system. (Especially when I was grading bibliographies and footnotes on a bazillion undergrad term papers last year. Undergrads tend to forget that there are books in the library, hence I was formatting a lot of internet citations for them.) My next task is convincing my professor (traditionalist to the core) that these are valid sources. The prohibition of the internet as a source is a stipulation on the syllabus. I have looked and looked for paper corroboration for some of the material I've found. At this point, I'm thankful for the internet. I couldn't have found this information without it.

So here's the question? (Austina, are you reading this!?!? oh future librarian, you!) How are we going to come to the point when the internet is a valid source in a research project? I've never used it before for this kind of tool. Sure, databases, they're great. But not for solid information. Even as I need to cite a website, I'm wary. How long will the information be there? How can the internet be used as a tool, when it is so fluctuating? I really feel in a quandry.

yikes

This paper is getting bigger than me. I've now exceeded the page limit by about four pages, and I'm only getting started on the second part, not to mention the conclusion. Good thing I can turn in a draft!

November 6, 2003

why Communism is appealing

I've been basically immersed in 1940's Soviet Russia for the past couple of weeks as I write a paper with a significant portion devoted to Shostakovich's Symphony No. 7. What is striking about the communist system is that everyone has an equal place. People are fighting the Nazis in the trenches, but the government knows that not everyone is gifted to carry a gun and shoot the enemy. So they get everyone to use whatever gifts he/she has and devote them to the war effort. This includes the composers, who are asked to write inspiring tunes to keep up the morale of the soldiers. Writers are asked to write, composers to compose, painters to paint, engineers to engineer, soldiers to fight, etc. Everybody has an equally valid place in society.

Now I realize that this ideal pales in terms of the reality of the situation, and that the content of the art that the cultural sector was asked to produce was in many instances propagandistic and not at all what they would have preferred to produce. For instance, Shostakovich was not allowed to experiment with the twelve-tone method or anything else deemed too dissonant by Stalin, literally, on pain of death. But reality is beside the point.

The point is that our society does not value the cultural sector like the communist society does (or did, I guess). Music and art are superfluous, evidenced by the fact that they are the first to be cut in any financially struggling school. The work of scholars and humanists is shoved into a corner, throwing enough pennies to let us keep our heads in dusty manuscripts. Meanwhile, the sciences are held up high as bastions and preservers of society. A $100,000 piece of equipment breaks in the chemistry department, and it is replaced the next day. While in the humanities we can't even get one of those things that projects your power point presentation from the laptop to the screen on the wall. If you say, "I am an historian," the result is glazed looks and "yes, but what do you do?" or "I wish I got spring break."

This is true in our little Christian circles, too. Being a scholar is not as equally valued as being a missionary or in the nebuluous "in ministry." God has given us different gifts. You'd think of all societies, the Christian one would be the most welcoming of the multifarious gifts bestowed on humans. On one hand, I don't really care what other people think of my profession. I enjoy it and strive to do it to the best of my ability. I mean, there's not much I can do about the fact that probably at least half the people at my university don't even know the discipline of musicology exists. What I worry about is just the overall cultural mindset the devalues the cultural and scholarly sectors of life. But, there's not much I can do there either. So I guess I'll go back to my paper...

why Harry Potter should be banned.

An excellent essay, with which I completely agree, found here.

The author, found at baraita.net, has highlighted the very points that have irked me about the books. Imagine how much more enriched the stories could be were this malady remedied!

November 5, 2003

chai recipe

After surveying several recipes off the internet, I settled on this one and tweaked it a bit to my liking:

Chai Recipe

Ingredients:

* 2 green cardamom pods
* 1 black cardamom pod
I only had green, and three green worked fine
* half teaspoon fennel seeds
I used anise seeds
* 2 cloves
I used four cloves
* 1/2" cinnamon stick
* 1 tea spoon tea leaves
* 1 and a 1/2 cup water
* 3/4 cup milk
* sugar
* fresh black pepper
I also used about a quarter to half teaspoon sized of crystalized ginger.

Steps:

1. Warm the green cardamom, black cardamom, fennel seeds, cloves and cinnamon stick in a frying pan for 15 to 20 seconds.
2. Take the warmed spices and grind using a mortar and pestle.
3. Bring to a boil the water and ground spices in an open pot. Turn down to simmer and let the spices steep a bit.
4. Add tea leaves and bring water to boil again, and then immediately turn down to simmer again.
5. Add milk.
6. Add a pinch of fresh ground black pepper.
7. Allow to come to a boil again then turn off.
8. Strain tea into cups and add sugar to taste. I don't normally take sugar in tea, but a little bit in this recipe doesn't make it too sweet, rather brings out the taste of the spices.
I tried to make the spices stretch to larger liquid amounts, but it didn't work as well. It seems best to keep the liquid to spice proportions relatively the same as designated here.

November 4, 2003

word sweep

words that I've never heard to I'm pretty sure I know but am just double-checking. let the vocab building begin!

carapace, n: The upper body-shell of tortoises, and of crustaceans. Extended to the hard case investing the body in some other animals, as certain Infusoria. hmmm. I guess as an adj. it would be "hard-shelled". I just know the context I read this wasn't biological.

The word I read was "subornable". The closest the Oxford Eng Dictionary gives is
suborn, v: To bribe or unlawfully procure (a person) to make accusations or give evidence; to induce to give false testimony or to commit perjury. Also, to procure (evidence) by such unlawful means.

geometral, a. :Geometrically drawn; showing the plan or section of a building.

Okay, these past three words were from the same author. Given his personality, he probably used them just to sound pretentious, seeing that the second word he kind of made up, and the third word is obsolete/rare.

tacit, a.: Unspoken, unvoiced; silent, emitting no sound; noiseless, wordless.

germane, a.: Closely connected; appropriate; relevant; pertinent

alacrity, n.: Briskness, cheerful readiness, liveliness, promptitude, sprightliness.

ineluctable, a.: From which one cannot escape by struggling; not to be escaped from.

abstruse, a.: Remote from apprehension or conception; difficult, recondite.

doyen, n.: The senior member of a body. = DEAN

somnolence, n.: Inclination to sleep; sleepiness, drowsiness.

harry potter?


No. It's Shostakovich. A singular composer of paradoxical proportions. Living in fear of the Soviet government, yet a member of the Communist party. He told them what they wanted to hear, but his compositions are works of irony and double-meaning.

He said: "Naturally, this is not an exhaustive list of possible parallels. With time, willing lovers of parallels can expand it greatly. Of course, in order to do that they would have to seriously dig around in my works--both those that have been given voice and those that are hidden from the eyes of 'musicological officials.' But for a true musicologist, with a musical education and musical goals, this could be fruitful, albeit hard, work. That's all right, let them sweat a little." Testimony: The Memoirs of Dmitri Shostakovich, as related to and edited by Solomon Volkov, trans. Antonina W. Bouis (New York: Harper & Row, 1979), 240.

Yep, I'm sweating a little. But very intrigued.

i'm trying not to stress about it

But how in the world can I be completely consistent in grading a stack of over 80 article summaries??

So this is my method:
If they get the main points, but I have to mark a lot of grammar, punctuation, and miserably awkward sentences, I give them a 90, still an A.
If they get the main points, but wrote very well, I give them a 98. (So far no one has been perfect with punctuation, hence not 100.)
If they get the main points, but they have sentence fragments and run-on sentences, which I think are unforgivable in college writing, I give them an 88, a B+.
If they ramble, don't really state the main points, but have some salient details and decent writing, I give them an 85.
If they ramble, don't really state the main points, but have some salient details, but have sentence fragments and run-on sentences, I give them an 80, a B.

So far, I haven't come up with other categories. The assignment was simply to summarize an article.

I hate being a T.A. sometimes. I might structure an assignment differently. For instance, I would've had them include proper Chicago citation of the article, too, so that they would get some bibliography experience. I would've also had them include a paragraph of response, so that they would get some critical thinking experience, too. It's not like they're being overworked for this class. They might have one other short assignment this semester. They're juniors.

_____

Things to be thankful about:
The porch is fixed. No more pigeons roosting on it. (Don't get me started on how much I hate pigeons. I think they're basically flying rats.)

I successfully made chai. (Will post recipe later.)

The 10-day forecast said that it would be under 80 degrees over the weekend.

My paper is coming along.

November 3, 2003

blah

It's times of the semester like this that I really just want to work at a grocery store...like at my nice Whole Foods. Just a job, where I get a weekly pay check and can live like normal adults my age. I'm tired of feeling like a college student...oh wait! i AM one!! well, grad student. I'm not an undergrad, but I somehow haven't entered society yet. I work to death, but instead of getting paid (well, I do a meager amount), I PAY! I pay someone else to allow me to work hard!! What's wrong with this picture!!!!?!?!?!?!?!? Some scholars are just not normal people. Did they become that way or were they born that way?

AAAaaaand. I think it's incredibly underestimated the sheer force of will it takes to WRITE. Sure we can read articles and books and discuss out to wazoo. But when it comes down to trying to formulate an original idea on the page...there's no one left to help you. You just have to do it! It's like chiseling every letter out of granite to come up with an original sculpture.


AAAAnnnnnddddd.... Why is it that my week starts off kilter because I didn't spend Saturday studying all day, like every other day in the week, just so that I could scrub and wax my kitchen floor!? What kind of life is this that doesn't allow you the time to clean your own house!? Oh, I took the time, but at the expense of my Monday.

I need a haircut. It's still in the mid-80's and it's now November.

(let's see, what else can I complain about?...)

November 1, 2003

NOLA

I love Halloween in NOLA. (that's New Orlean, LA) We never did it when I was a kid. I really don't have a problem with it. To me, if you're going to decorate a Christmas tree, you may as well go trick-or-treating. Same origins, wh. have little to bear on us now. Besides, then I'll get to eat all my kids' candy! :-P But Halloween in NOLA is especially fun. NOLA can do a party, that's for sure. Lights go up for every holiday starting with Halloween and ending with Mardi Gras. I was driving home from the grocery store last night after it had been dark for an hour. The air was warm, but not hot, breezy, but not cold. Mid-70's, I think. People sat on the porches amid flickering jack-o-laterns and bedecked children in a pool of candy. Parents dragged tots along in wagons. Fun tunes wafted from radio. We don't live in a neighborhood with many kids, so we didn't get any trick-or-treaters, but it was sure fun driving around with the windows open and watching everybody have a good time.