The greatest irony
When we had a baby and found out that he was deaf, one of the first things we did was set about learning sign language as fast as possible. Signing was something I was considering anyway, because of the widespread popularity of baby signs to give babies early communication tools. And I mean, don't all deaf people sign? The answer, astoundingly, is NO!
There are a huge amount of deaf babies that are born and not taught sign language. It's ironic, isn't it? The professionals tell the parents that if they sign with their deaf babies, they'll never learn how to talk. Which is like the biggest myth ever. But it started with Alexander Graham Bell, you know, the American hero who invented the telephone? He actually had some really harsh things to say against deaf people and signing, bordering on eugenicsm. It's really shocking. But ever since there's been this ridiculous strain of auditory-ism in deaf education.
Why wouldn't you teach a baby using its strengths in those early language years? I tell my friends that so many people don't sign with their deaf babies, and they are so surprised! But we sign with our hearing babies!
Amy Cohen Efron, a Deaf blogger, made a great essay vlog (videoblog) about this Great Irony.
The AG Bell Foundation national meeting is this weekend, and many Deaf adults are protesting for the rights of deaf babies to sign. I've appreciated the polemic they've taken, promoting bilingualism, with the emphasis on teaching babies using their strength, their visual and manual senses, early on.
It doesn't seem like the protest is going very well, given the report on the blogs. It's kind of sad, because the conference hotel is very hostile, when protesters planned very carefully how to be peaceful and positive.
Comments
Jeanette,
My heart is full that you wrote this entry on your blog that you understood "The Greatest Irony" - and you were able to explain to your readers so well that it makes me so happy.
What even makes me happier is that you are a parent of a Deaf child who learns ASL since birth, and receives cochlear implant and learning to listen and talk and still using ASL.
I wish I am like Ellis when I was younger. But, I am very proud of you that you and your husband made this kind of informed decision, and Ellis will be eternally grateful for you as very loving, involved and caring parents.
You have shown your love for your son, unconditionally, and accept him as being Deaf, and Ellis is so fortunate to learn two languages that will enrich his learning for the rest of his life!
Big, major and enormous hugs from me.
Amy Cohen Efron
Posted by: Amy Cohen Efron | July 28, 2007 12:27 PM
Comments
I agree with a lot of things you have said, But I thought he was Scottish?
Why call him a Hero?
Also what he has said caused a great deal of myths long after his death. :-(
Posted by: Fintan | July 28, 2007 12:54 PM
Comments
If I understand a commenter correctly, was your son implanted after learning sign language? How old was he implanted? Is he able to understand a spoken conversation of a stranger either in person or on phone? Help educate me. :-)
Posted by: Jean Boutcher | July 28, 2007 01:48 PM
Comments
Thanks, Jeannette! I had no idea so many deaf babies were being encouraged NOT to use ASL! I've just always assumed that we hearing families were stealing advantages from the deaf community. That ticks me off.
Posted by: lynnp | July 28, 2007 02:39 PM
Comments
Thank you so much for sharing! This is wonderful, a hearing parent speaking out on the topic. Thank you!
Posted by: Jenny | July 28, 2007 04:07 PM
Comments
What a great video - thanks to Amy for all the info. And, Amy, you have such a beautiful smile. I didn't know that there was any structured ideology that discouraged deaf children from learning sign. How crazy! That makes no sense. It's the best language for them, and they're robbed of it, and at an age when they can best assimilate it and have no idea what they are being robbed of. If they feel that earlier access to communication comforts/helps a hearing baby, how much more does having sign give comfort and help to a deaf child of any age! It seems bizarre that they think having ASL would keep a child from using hearing. Knowing English doesn't keep people from learning Spanish, if they need it and want to. A person acquires as much language as he is able, and as is useful to him. Thanks so much for all this great info!
Posted by: mary kathryn | July 28, 2007 06:56 PM
Comments
"I agree with a lot of things you have said, But I thought he was Scottish?
Why call him a Hero?"
I was just trying to be witty. Calling him the "great American hero" was tapping into his general persona and being somewhat ironic at the same time. ;-)
"If I understand a commenter correctly, was your son implanted after learning sign language? How old was he implanted? Is he able to understand a spoken conversation of a stranger either in person or on phone? Help educate me. :-)"
My son has been learning sign language since about 5 months old, which was when we started learning and teaching him. He was implanted a few weeks ago at 2yrs old, so I have no idea what he'll be able to do in terms of telephone usage, stranger talk. It's all new territory for me.
"That ticks me off."
Me too!!!
Posted by: Jeannette | July 28, 2007 08:05 PM
Comments
Jeannette
I can't find your e-mail... can you send one to mine??
-M
Posted by: Moriah | July 29, 2007 12:18 AM
Comments
Funny you mentioned this because on another site, there's a cartoon that sums this issue up...
http://www.moeart.com/blog/?p=32
Posted by: Keri | July 29, 2007 08:28 PM
Comments
Hi Jeanette,
thank you so much for sharing your thoughts on the Greatest Irony, it is wonderful to see a hearing person understand what we're trying to share...
So many people out there are unaware, there must be a way where everyone is aware. Perhaps 60 minutes? :)
thanks :)
Posted by: SusanA | July 31, 2007 09:10 AM
Comments
Jeanette,
You, as a parent who is learning sign language, are the hero in your son's tale. Bless you!
~ LaRonda
Posted by: LaRonda | July 31, 2007 11:49 AM
Comments
As a proud (hearing)father of a Deaf son, I am ecstatic to say Seth and I began learning sign when he was a year old or so and began with S.E.E and am now starting to work my way into ASL from PSE and I can see the gears turn in his head and the thought process in motion when ASL is used, if I try an sign in a proper manner(SEE)using English grammar I can see where Seth becomes lost somewhere between structure and lack of descriptiveness. ASL is all inclusive, personal and interactive rather than a grammatical monstrocity as proclaimed by others. He was implanted at 1 1/2 and it didn't work well and no longer uses the device for various reasons and have never been able to advocate this procedure. I work with him on his voice now and again because I love to hear the sound of an innocent and untrained voice and furthermore think that time spent early on,in a life size game of memory for pursuit of vocal training is merely a wasted youth. I can't say enough about ASL not only can my son have beautiful language but also communication that rivals poetry, music and art. Thanks to those who made this possible and gave so freely for our enjoyment.
Posted by: Aaron Isaac | July 31, 2007 08:40 PM