How to be cool in 1000 words
So many posts to be written. So much of my thesis to be written. So many phone calls to make. Dishes to wash. And now it's the next day from when I started this post, so let's try to finish, okay?
Anyway, I'll try to touch on one of the many blog posts that I want to write right now. Even though it's not waiting its turn behind other blog posts in my brain. I read New Kid's post this afternoon about what it feels like to be on the hiring end of the market, to see all those shiny candidates and feel a bit lack-lustre yourself. And I think one of the things she said gave me a point at which draw some of my academic angst lately. ('Cause I wouldn't be a real grad student without academic angst.) The feeling of my work is so irrelevant! Not in the sense of, I'm studying old stuff, not caring for orphans in Romania; my work is so irrelevant, more like She's writing a cool thesis on the Velvet Underground; mine is on a manuscript few people would care about; my work is so irrelevant. (Not to knock your thesis, Funke; I've given up trying to be as cool as you. *grin*)
It all comes from this conversation I had last October. If you've been following my grad school saga, you'll know that I decided to end my program with a terminal master's and reapply for a newer PhD program in my new city (aka Local Fabulous University) for many good reasons and I have my dept's blessing, so all's good. Well, I got accepted at Local Fab U last spring, but wait-listed for funding (it's a very competitive program, so I was flattered to even get that far). They invited me to visit, were very encouraging, tried through late-April (!) to get me a package, but to no avail. So I was all set to reapply, because this is the place I REALLY, really want to go to. In Oct, I went to talk to the Director of Grad Studies about how to make this application a successful one. He told me that the reason I didn't get an offer straight up last spring was that my interests weren't broad enough. Yea, I was strong and definitive in my area, but I needed to show that I had diverse research interests.
[begin rant]
okay. I'll let myself go off on this tangent.
So medieval studies, which you know encompasses a good 700 years (we don't really start until 800 or 900 CE) is not diverse enough for it to be considered broad to have an interest in 11th century theology and 14th century vernacular? I'll admit I was a little annoyed. Because when you're selling yourself in 1000 words to a major research university, don't you want to show that you have a pretty focused idea about what you want to do? I did mention secondary interests, but I didn't dwell on them. I thought I had a pretty kickass personal statement. And I was further annoyed because my competition was these fresh undergrads from elite schools who have vague ideas about what they want to do. So is that the reason for the need to be diverse? to talk about a variety of things you're interested, because you don't have enough focus to be specific about the one? [not to knock to the poor, fresh undergrads--but I was pretty focused back then, too; that's why I was applying to grad school--furthermore, my focus hasn't changed a whole lot; though my dream dissertation has now been taken over by two Important Scholars that have monopolized the use of the archives to others. Grrr.] Maybe I don't know what I'm talking about. Maybe my assumptions were all wrong to begin with. I just found it odd that I was waitlisted because I had too much focus.
[end rant]
But that begin a whole wave of self-doubt. Am I not interesting enough? Cool enough? What are my broad interests? I have some interests that would be considered broad, but I don't want to invest the time it would take in order to do them well, at least right now anyway. That's why I'm not focusing on them. (One such interest is the legacy of Hegel in 19th c music...especially Wagner; I think if you look at Gesamtkunstwerk through the eyes of Hegel it recasts our Grout and Palisca [famous music history textbook] assumptions. But then I would have to get solid in German and understand Hegel. Aiyiyi. I know enough to get me in trouble, but not enough to get me out.) It's all so exhausting. I'm interested in international hip-hop and R &B, because I find it fascinating how other cultures fuse what are essentially American genres into their own culture's music language to come up with something very interesting and often politically laden (as those genres traditionally are). But I know so very little about pop music in general that I would have to learn the history of entire genres in order to form a coherent statement of interest. It's all so exhausting!
But those kinds of projects seem more "relevant." The same fifteen people aren't necessarily going to read them. But I like medieval studies! Not that I don't like the others, but it's Car Musicology to me...theorizing about the music as I listen to it in the car (which is where a lot of my serious listening happens; sitting still with awesome CD player; toddler safely confined and entertained by the other cars).
Ugh. This post isn't really going anywhere, and now it's starting to annoy me. But it's really indicative of where I am right now. Unsure. Well, sure of where I ultimately want to end up in terms of a dissertation project, which seems to unattainably in the future.
Rather loose strings of thought flapping in the wind. Am I cool enough to grab onto a couple of those strings?
I didn't reapply for the fall. I want to use my thesis as a writing sample, and there are a couple of item that could improve my overall application that I was not able to address this fall (including a finished thesis). The deadline was mid-December, and I let it slip by me. It's taken me a while to talk about it. For some reason, I felt really weird about watching that date go by.
Not to mention some family issues that aren't necessarily related to the fact that I have a child and want at least one more, my reapplication to the grad school of my dreams leaves me in a quandry. And I shouldn't be fussing over it all anyway, until I finish my stinkin' thesis!
File this post under Brain Barf. (since barf was on our minds of late)
UPDATE: You know, I don't want this post to be about complaining about the results of my application last year. Yea, I'm confused about some aspects, but I know so much more goes into application evaluations beyond individual people. For instance, they may have a particular class forming and they see a certain dynamic/representation of interests or whatever. I don't really know. This post is about greater angst articulated in this particular instance through the conversation I had in October.
I also find it very interesting that a lively discussion is being held on my discipline's listserv about diversity of topics (and taking the road less traveled) in relation to diss topics and future employability.
Comments
Aww, what a frustrating experience this must have been for you! I can't believe the university didn't think you were diverse/interesting enough. You are a very busy mom and student...it's not like you have time to la de da! =P I really hope that everything works out for you soon, including baby #2. We are working on that too. ;)
Posted by: Keri | January 31, 2007 08:08 AM
Comments
Okay, here's my take as one of the super broad "interesting" people. You say: But" then I would have to get solid in German and understand Hegel" and "I would have to learn the history of entire genres in order to form a coherent statement of interest."
Here's where I think you're slightly overestimating. Those are the things you'd need to do in order to complete projects like that. You can get away with knowing a whole lot less in order to frame a coherent statement of interest.
Not that you should change interests from medieval studies to hip hop. But maybe what you could do is find some conceptual resonance between what it is that you like about your medieval material and something else. Not that you'd focus on that, but it would allow you to frame your statement in a much sexier way and let's face it, it's all about sex appeal!
The best advice I ever got on this topic was this: sit down and think about the questions that drive you. Don't think about the particular stuff you find interesting. Think about your questions. The person who told me this said most people are working on two or three key questions. My interests came down to one question. Once you've identified your question(s), you can unify your primary and secondary interests under a single rubric, allowing your reader to see that you are interested in things beyond your necessarily narrow thesis topic without confusing the issue or muddying your hard-earned focus.
Posted by: Anastasia | January 31, 2007 10:56 AM
Comments
Well, coolness really depends on the people around you. People at my church who are into country line-dancing ask me "So what is your thesis on? Who the heck are the Velvet Underground? Well, as long as you enjoy it..." whereas in my secular more rock conscious university setting people are more apt to find me cool. I mean, I could do a thesis on the Simpsons and in some circles no one would have a clue what I was even talking about. So, as Abraham Lincoln once said, "You can be cool for some of the people some of the time. You can be cool for some of the people all of the time. You can even be cool for all of the people some of the time, but you can never be cool for all of the people all of the time."
And I personally think *your* thesis is cool. I mean, if Steve Reich thought 12th century organum was cool enough to stick into his compositions, how can I knock the medievals???
And as for relevance: I recently found a book whose main premise was EXACTLY the same as mine (how the avant garde and popular musics were really primed to interact with each other in the 1960s blah blah blah) and was like NOW WHAT? But the book focuses on the Beatles instead of the Velvet Underground and since these two bands had really different philosophical approaches, I think I might just be able to salvage my thesis. But finding stuff like that just makes me want to write in big red letters over my stuff: "I did TOO think of this all by myself!!! And now I will go hide in a corner because someone else thought of it first."
Sigh.
Posted by: funke | January 31, 2007 12:17 PM
Comments
you know, anastasia, that's pretty much how I approached it to begin with. Which is even more maddening now that I think about it. I figured I was describing my approach to the discipline, and how I want to see that bear out in my particular field/interest/topic (and I was very specific) and how my approach affected why I had other interests, which I mentioned oh so cursorily.
You know, it kind of feels good talk about this finally. I've been kind of harboring this weird confusion since October. Because, I thouht it was about deep structure, and what they were telling me was that I didn't have enough surface detail?! Dude, it's ONE THOUSAND words, what can I do?! I don't know. I guess all i can do is blog and wonder. *Let us blog, and sing and wonder*
Posted by: Jeannette | January 31, 2007 02:06 PM
Comments
Jnet, you're one of the most "diverse" and "interesting" people--and scholars--I know. It's too bad that major university didn't catch onto that, but hopefully next time they'll realize it.
Meanwhile, can you occasionally pop by their colloquia or other events open to the public to let them know you're still interested in their program and that you're still in the area?
Posted by: Jo | February 1, 2007 10:20 AM
Comments
I LOVE the Abaham Lincoln quote! hahahahahahaha
blogging and singing and wondering.............
Posted by: mom1 | February 1, 2007 09:37 PM
Comments
admissions are weird. the program that denied by husband last year told him it was b/c he didn't have any background. he pointed out that not only did he have several seminars in their department from his master's, he had a slew of other classes that any student in their department could have taken for phd credit. the admissions person responded with "hmmm...yes, I see you're right...."
anyway, I totally understand the confusion.
Posted by: Anastasia | February 3, 2007 12:59 PM
Comments
sure! your post really struck me. for one thing, I think your work sounds terribly interesting! For another thing, I'm frequently told just the opposite of what they told you. I look all interesting and broad but I don't come across as being focused and grounded. So now and then its....well, yes, your work is interesting, but it lacks focus/rigor/whatever. you should work on that. and I get to say, yah...great, thanks...:)
Posted by: Anastasia | February 3, 2007 02:34 PM