My ONE Political Post
Okay. I'm deleting the post formerly known as "The Morning After." I realize that I was cranky and grumpy and reacting from my gut.
[Consider all this, my family and friends who are shocked and try to convince me otherwise. What if the rhetoric of my previous ONE political post had been against Kerry? (As much has been writting in cov/chattablogdom.) I wouldn't have received such a "warm" response that was left on the blog today, evidenced by the commentage on said context. It just so happens that 99% of my readership are Republicans who really believe what they believe.]
For my ONE political post, I'll offer a more benign version:
I am not a fan of Bush. I am really disappointed with his administration and how he's used his faith in his office. I am intrigued with Kerry partly because he isn't Bush and partly because I just plain agreed with some of the stuff he said--stuff I heard in other places besides NPR. I don't necessarily think he would've delivered on all he said or solved all Bush's problems. No candidate can. It's unrealistic to expect them to. I was willing to go for a fresh start, though.
You see, even though I've grown up just like all the Republican cov/chattabloggers, family and friends, I'm ready for something different. Not out of puerile "I just want something different"-ness. I've just revised my political priorities.
The government has taken on a new role in my perspective. I see government as the preserver of the greatest common denominator of social good--even if it means being slightly different from my personal beliefs. Basically, I don't see it as the preserver of the "American family" or "American values" anymore. The day we elect officials to perform these roles is a sad day.
I really don't care about the government around me. I want the officials to build a stable and economically viable society. But when it comes down to values, I turn to what I believe is the proper context as holder, protector, and sustainer of these values...the church. Not a government, not a school. I don't believe America is on a slippery slope downwards, etc. Sin doesn't get worse. It always is as bad as it's going to get. And the government isn't going to mitigate that situation. If I want to persevere in preserving the family, God has already provided the covenantal community of the church. Government is there for the practical day-to-day sustaining of people: health care, homes, safety, etc., because the rules of ancient Israel don't apply anymore.
Perhaps you disagree with my reasoning. I will admit that I'm in the early stages of my development in thinking about government. I would ask that if you strenuously disagree with me and feel indignant by my words that you would not comment. If you have something constructive to say, I wouldn't mind engaging in conversation. But for the most part, I'd rather this be my ONE political post, and move on to more banal and esoteric daily subjects as is my wont.
Comments
thanks for outlining your thoughts. I really do find them helpful, especially as one who has been generally uncaring about politics.
I guess I've found the "he's not Bush" stance rather weak, but I suppose it's understandable. I've always considered it the lesser of two evils, and I've never been able to trust anything Kerry says. funny that Bush seems more trustworthy, given the whole WMD thing. I was hoping in his victory speach he'd say something like, "sorry about that whole WMD thing..."
Posted by: bobw | 03.11.04 22:11
Comments
ugh. it wont let me post something.
probably better that way anyway.
Posted by: bobw | 03.11.04 22:14
Comments
well, bob, you were right to admonish me earlier.
I never have been for the whole Iraq thing, and the WMD thing has only frustrated me more. And I wish Bush would just admit he's wrong about some things.
Posted by: Jeannette | 03.11.04 22:20
Comments
At the risk of causing feelings of animosity, I do want to disagree with a statement you made, but with the understanding that I do not wish to offend. I begin my comment in this way because many people get angry with others who simply disagree with them. Here, then, is my comment.
"Government is there for the practical day-to-day sustaining of people: health care, homes, safety, etc., because the rules of ancient Israel don't apply anymore."
I would disagree with this statement on two counts. One, Governments are "instituted among men" to secure "unalienable rights," among which are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Hapiness. Two, the purpose of our government has not to do with ancient Israel, but rather has to do with the Constitution and Bill of Rights, not excluding the Declaration of Independence.
That is all I have to add to your "moot thoughts and musings." Take care,
Carl
Posted by: Carl | 03.11.04 22:29
Comments
Tell it sister!
Posted by: Nat | 04.11.04 07:36
Comments
I'm not a Republican, I just don't think you're self-aware of your own liberal fundamentalism. Its fine being reactionary against the cov/southern thoughtless conservatism, but that reaction, once encultured, often times becomes just as thoughtless.
Posted by: JosiahQ | 04.11.04 08:19
Comments
i'm still saddened that you don't see nebraska as part of the intellectual elite. ;)
Posted by: charity | 04.11.04 08:22
Comments
Why would you think that "healthcare" is among the functions of government? I thought that went to doctors.
I've learned to hold my tongue with folks I know/meet who supported Kerry simply on the ground that Bush was certainly not worth voting for, so rest assured you have my forgiveness for that :)
Posted by: Paul Baxter | 04.11.04 08:27
Comments
Josiah, I still don't know how you can make such presumptions about me when you don't even know me (ok, we ate in the same Great Hall for a few years, but you don't know me as a person), and I never blog about politics. You've created a stereotype that you think is me.
I'm not being reactionary per se, and I hope I said as much.
I've just moved on.
Charity, the day Louisiana joins the intellectual elite, I'll be proud to call Nebraska "brother". ;D
Posted by: Jeannette | 04.11.04 08:28
Comments
Carl, those are functions of the American government specifically as outlined by the documents that we all agree to as American citizens.
I'm speaking of government in general, as a concept. And it would be wrong of me to impose the American governmental functions on Christians, in general, because there are Christians who live in other times and other places, and America is just a blip on the vast screen of time and place.
Posted by: Jeannette | 04.11.04 08:34
Comments
thanks for the political post, Jeannette, I kind of wish I had gotten to read the other one before you'd deleted it. It sounds interesting.
Posted by: linnea | 04.11.04 10:06
Comments
I dunno how I can say that when I barely know you either. But that's how I feel. I'm more than willing to be wrong about it, but you asked for thoughts and those are mine. I suppose i'm a walk-talk like a duck kinda guy when it comes to these things. But again, not certain 'bout any of this stuff.
Posted by: JosiahQ | 04.11.04 19:57
Comments
TO me it sounds like you should have voted libertarian, not democratic.
Posted by: holton | 05.11.04 17:12
Comments
Don't blame me - I voted for Peroutka! :p
Posted by: Len | 06.12.04 23:13